The Russian automobile market has recently been replenished with another affordable model. In this case we are talking about the German budget car Volkswagen Polo in the new generation. Now this vehicle will be sold in a liftback body. The recently released new product has already caused numerous discussions among car enthusiasts, since it is literally a new car that can become a leader in its class of budget vehicles. That is why this model is worth comparing with another representative of the budget segment of the Russian assembly, Lada Vesta, in order to ultimately decide which is better - Volkswagen Polo or Lada Vesta.
Lada Vesta 2020
Comparison of technical characteristics
Since many motorists first of all, when choosing a vehicle, pay attention to the main technical characteristics, here it is necessary to highlight the most significant parameters of the presented cars, namely:
- Lada Vesta is sold in a sedan body, the German competitor is sold in a liftback body;
- the domestic model consumes AI-92 fuel, rival AI-95;
- both cars can only be purchased in front-wheel drive versions;
- public sector vehicles are available in petrol versions;
- average fuel consumption in the combined cycle is 6.4 liters. for Polo, 6.9 l. at West;
- Lada's maximum speed is 175 km/h, Volkswagen's is 184 km/h;
- the German accelerates to the first hundred in 11.4 s, the Russian model in 11.2 s;
- The cars belong to the Euro-5 environmental safety class.
In this case, similar cars in the most affordable variations were compared. It is noteworthy that a domestic car can also be purchased with gas equipment, however, such modifications are not particularly in demand.
Exterior of competing models
Comparison of Lada Vesta and Volkswagen Polo
Comparison of Lada Vesta and Volkswagen Polo should start with this category.
- The appearance of the Togliatti model is distinguished by its aggressive features and sporting spirit. The front part is equipped with a dimensional radiator grille, to which a noticeable air intake is harmoniously attached. The peculiar bend of the chrome elements and the burning gaze through the headlights makes the Lada Vesta a beast of prey.
- Looking at the profile of the car, the feeling of aggressiveness does not disappear. Particularly noticeable are the stampings made in the “X-style” and spreading along the entire body. The discs highlight the overall spirit that prevails in this product. The rear is defined by a large bumper, sharp-looking lights and a distinct logo that makes itself known so clearly.
- The front part of the Volkswagen Polo is distinguished by a somewhat convex hood, and the windshield has fairly sharp corners. Compared to previous versions, the style of the radiator grille, air intake and fog lights has been changed. Rational headlights add solidity and masculinity.
- The gaps on the sides are strictly adjusted, which indicates the flawless assembly of the German car. There are playful curves at the bottom of the doors, and the mirror fits neatly into the look. The discs harmonize well with the overall appearance. The excellent rear end confidently and calmly completes the exterior.
Engines and transmission
Another key point that potential buyers of a budget car should pay attention to when choosing a Volkswagen Polo or Lada Vesta is the power unit. In this regard, state employees received good equipment, although the German liftback looks more interesting, for the simple reason that there are three alternative engines, as well as three transmissions to choose from depending on the version of the car. For the domestic model, the manufacturer has provided only two main engines and two gearboxes. It can be said directly that in the case of the Lada Vesta, the choice is really meager, despite the fact that this car has been sold on the Russian car market for five years.
The new German model Volkswagen Polo in a liftback body can be purchased with a naturally aspirated 1.6-liter engine with a capacity of 90 and 110 horsepower, depending on the degree of boost. This motor allows you to transmit 155 N*m of torque to the wheels. This power plant can be paired with a 5-speed manual gearbox or a modern 6-speed automatic transmission. There is also a more interesting variation of the car available for sale with a turbocharged 1.4-liter unit with an output of 125 horsepower and 200 Nm of torque. This motor interacts exclusively with a robotic 7-speed DSG gearbox. This model can only be purchased in a front-wheel drive version.
The Russian car did not receive a charged version, unlike its German competitor, and we can safely say that the Lada Vesta is inferior in terms of power, since it uses the already familiar 1.6 and 1.8 liter engines with output of 106 and 122 horsepower and 148 – 170 N*m of torque. As for models equipped with LPG, they are equipped primarily with a 1.6-liter unit producing 113 hp. and a 5-speed manual transmission. Gasoline naturally aspirated modifications of the car are equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission, as well as a 5-speed robot. Some versions of the car use a CVT, although this gearbox has not gained serious distribution and popularity.
Whose interior is better: Lada Vesta or Volkswagen Polo
The interior design of these two cars is significantly different from each other. AvtoVAZ designers clearly took the sports version as a basis, and this can be seen in many details. The dashboard is distinguished by deep wells, which are complemented by a stylish three-spoke steering wheel. The center console is modern and, surprisingly for a domestic manufacturer, attractive. Black plastic was chosen as the main material for the front panel of Vesta, complemented by a small amount of metal inserts.
All instrument readings are visible and can be read without any problems. Controls are within easy reach. For Russian motorists, the only unusual detail is the standard armrest between the front seats. But the seats themselves are comfortable, despite mechanical adjustments and not the most pronounced lateral and rear support. Good visibility is provided by a large glass area. The rear row of seats is spacious and can comfortably accommodate three people. The only drawback is the sloping roof, so it is not very comfortable for tall passengers.
Lada Vesta can be called the best Russian car with well-thought-out ergonomics.
Volkswagen Polo is designed differently inside. With the typical German responsibility, the interior details are literally thought out down to the millimeter. Ergonomics are beyond praise, every button or control is in its usual place, and you can use them without being distracted from the road. There are no claims to the arrangement of the internal space as such. The three-spoke steering wheel in Volkswagen's signature style, the classic configuration of the center console, the air duct deflectors of the usual rectangular shape, black plastic complemented by beige inserts, and the chrome-plated edges of the main units on the dashboard immediately catch your eye. As for the Polo instrument cluster, it is made in the same recognizable style, and the readings from it are easy to read.
The seats of the Volkswagen Polo have a deep profile, providing additional comfort. The view is excellent, although the glazing occupies a smaller area. The Polo has a narrower wheelbase, so the interior space is somewhat more compact. And while the front is relatively spacious, the back will be cramped for three passengers of average build. Such an interior may seem boring and too bland, but buyers of such models are satisfied with the design and features of the interior space.
Ride quality, maneuverability and handling
Since many Russian car enthusiasts cannot afford the opportunity to purchase an off-road vehicle, they are interested in whether budget cars can boast of at least some cross-country ability? As practice shows, these front-wheel drive models are not suitable for off-road use, even when there is no precipitation for a long time. Does not allow you to cope with terrain where there is no road surface as such, low ground clearance, low weight and lack of all-wheel drive. Of course, this does not mean that such cars cannot be used for active recreation; simply, there is a high probability that outside help will be required if the car gets stuck.
If we talk about the driving performance and handling of the German Volkswagen Polo, then this is an excellent model, which, although it has a rather stiff suspension, can at the same time please with its dynamics and maneuverability. The car holds the road perfectly, and in addition, instantly reacts even to a slight turn of the steering wheel. It is worth noting that the ground clearance of this model is only 170 mm, which will be quite enough for the city and the highway. German manufacturers equipped their cars with an independent spring suspension at the front and a semi-independent spring system at the rear. There are anti-roll bars on each axle, which prevents the car from rolling during sharp turns at high speed and when maneuvering. There are ventilated disc brakes at the front and drum or conventional disc brakes at the rear, depending on the configuration.
The Russian Lada Vesta is a good budget sedan with a rigid suspension, which allows you not to worry about the support components. The suspension system in this model is reliable and unpretentious. This vehicle has mediocre handling, but at the same time good driving performance. The car handles the road well and has excellent dynamics. Of course, in comparison with the German liftback, the difference is immediately felt, however, do not forget that the domestic model is noticeably cheaper. At the front, this car is equipped with an independent MacPherson spring suspension and anti-roll bars. At the rear, the manufacturers installed a semi-independent spring system with drum brakes. There are ventilated disc brakes at the front.
Chassis
Early Vesta models irritated their owners with knocking struts and creaking stabilizer bushings - all this is a thing of the past. Otherwise, there are no obvious problems, except that the “armor-piercing” suspension teaches you to drive without slowing down before bumps, so the chassis parts of the “flyers” get the full benefit.
The Polo will not allow you to drive like this: the shorter-travel suspension will quickly teach you to drive over speed bumps slowly. However, the energy intensity is not bad, and everything is good with reliability. On early copies there were questions regarding the steering, but on newer cars this is all right.
In general, in terms of operating costs, everything is more or less comparable. At the same time, both cars handle very pleasantly, and Vesta also pleases with its “omnivorous” suspension. Plus there is a Cross version with increased ground clearance. Lada also has ESP in all versions, while in Polo the exchange rate stability system was offered for an additional fee in expensive versions.
Comparison of configurations and prices
If you need to choose which is better - Volkswagen Polo or Lada Vesta in terms of price, then you won’t have to think long about it, for the simple reason that a domestic car is an order of magnitude cheaper than its competitor. In addition, potential buyers can count on numerous discounts when purchasing this model, as well as participation in various government support programs. If we talk about technical equipment, then the German car has a clear advantage, for the simple reason that it is a newer car than its rival. In terms of basic configurations, there is practically no difference; both cars have four of them. However, if necessary, potential buyers can choose Lada Vesta with an extended package of options.
At the moment, Russian buyers can purchase the German-made Volkswagen Polo liftback for 792,900 – 1,209,900 rubles. This model is sold in four basic trim levels. We are talking about modifications Origin, Respect, Status and Exclusive. The most budget model does not boast an abundance of options, and there is only a number of electronic aids and assistants, as well as tire pressure sensors, a 12V socket, active power steering, a modern multimedia system, standard audio preparation and a number of other functions. As for the more expensive versions, rich equipment is added here, including keyless access to the car interior, remote engine start, LED optics, DRL and fog lights, advanced audio preparation, light and rain sensors, parking sensors, cruise control, and climate control and a variety of electronic driver assistance systems.
Options and prices (Volkswagen Polo)
| # | Equipment | Model years | Cost, rub. | Drive unit | Transmission | Engine, cc. cm | Acceleration from 0 to 100, s | Max. speed, km/h | Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm | Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km |
| 1 | 1.4 TSI DSG Exclusive | 2020 — | 1 209 900 | Front | Manual transmission 7 | 1395 | 9.3 | 204 | 125 (92) / 6000 | 6,0 |
| 2 | 1.4 TSI DSG Status | 2020 — | 1 069 900 | Front | Manual transmission 7 | 1395 | 9.3 | 204 | 125 (92) / 6000 | 6,0 |
| 3 | 1.6 MPI MT Origin | 2020 — | 792 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 11.4 | 184 | 90 (66) / 4250 | 6,4 |
| 4 | 1.6 MPI MT Respect | 2020 — | 837 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 11.4 | 184 | 90 (66) / 4250 | 6,4 |
| 5 | 1.6 MPI MT Exclusive | 2020 — | 1 111 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 10.7 | 195 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,4 |
| 6 | 1.6 MPI MT Respect | 2020 — | 877 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 10.7 | 195 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,4 |
| 7 | 1.6 MPI MT Status | 2020 — | 971 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1598 | 10.7 | 195 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,4 |
| 8 | 1.6 MPI AT Exclusive | 2020 — | 1 161 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1598 | 11.8 | 190 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 9 | 1.6 MPI AT Respect | 2020 — | 927 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1598 | 11.8 | 190 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 10 | 1.6 MPI AT Status | 2020 — | 1 021 900 | Front | Automatic 6 | 1598 | 11.8 | 190 | 110 (81) / 5800 | 6,6 |
* — information on prices is for reference only. Check with your local dealer for exact pricing.
The Russian budget sedan Lada Vesta can currently be purchased for 653,900 – 973,900 rubles. This car is also sold in four main modifications: Classic, Comfort, Luxe and Exclusive. In the most budget version, the car is equipped with a number of electronic assistants and driver assistants, power steering, audio preparation, as well as a standard multimedia system and daytime running lights. As the cost increases, options such as a modern multimedia complex, rear parking sensors, a rear view camera, cruise control, 1-zone climate control, a cooled glove box, and a multifunction steering wheel are added to this sedan.
Options and prices (Lada Vesta)
| # | Equipment | Model years | Cost, rub. | Drive unit | Transmission | Engine, cc. cm | Acceleration from 0 to 100, s | Max. speed, km/h | Power, max., hp (kW) at rpm | Fuel consumption in the combined cycle, l/100 km |
| 1 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2020 — | 721 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 2 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2020 — | 765 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 3 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 757 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 4 | 1.6MT Classic | November 2022 — | 653 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 5 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | November 2022 — | 690 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 6 | 1.6MT Exclusive | November 2022 — | 878 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 7 | 1.6MT Luxe | November 2022 — | 783 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 8 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2022 — | 824 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 9 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2022 — | 846 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 10 | 1.6MT Comfort | November 2022 - 2020 | 697 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 11 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | November 2022 - 2020 | 720 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 12 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | November 2022 - 2020 | 728 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 13 | 1.6MT Standard | 2019 - November 2019 | 606 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 14 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 807 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 15 | 1.6MT Classic | 2018 - November 2019 | 609 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 16 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | 2018 - November 2019 | 651 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 17 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 679 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 18 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 702 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 19 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2018 - November 2019 | 700 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 20 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Image package | 2016 - December 2017 | 645 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 21 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2016 - December 2017 | 685 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 22 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 728 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 23 | 1.6 MT Luxe Yubileynaya | 2016 — 2017 | 735 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 24 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 707 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.2 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 25 | 1.6MT Classic | 2016 - December 2017 | 569 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 26 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start package | 2016 - December 2017 | 594 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 27 | 1.6 MT Classic + Start 6FD package | 2015 - December 2015 | 544 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 28 | 1.6 MT Classic 000 | 2015 - December 2015 | 514 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 29 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Lime Multimedia X4P package | 2015 — 2016 | 652 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 30 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Lime X00 package | 2015 — 2016 | 628 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 31 | 1.6 MT Comfort + Optima package | 2015 — 2016 | 599 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 32 | 1.6MT Luxe | 2015 — 2016 | 623 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 33 | 1.6 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2015 — 2016 | 647 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 34 | 1.6MT Comfort | 2015 - December 2017 | 622 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 11.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,9 |
| 35 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2018 — 2018 | 685 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 36 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2018 - November 2018 | 735 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 37 | 1.6 AMT Classic + Start package | 2018 - November 2019 | 676 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 38 | 1.6 AMT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 704 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 39 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2016 - December 2017 | 710 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 40 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 795 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 41 | 1.6 AMT Luxe Yubileynaya | 2016 — 2017 | 760 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 42 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2016 - November 2019 | 732 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 14.1 | 182 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 43 | 1.6 AMT Classic + Start package | 2016 - December 2017 | 619 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 44 | 1.6 AMT Classic 000 | 2015 - December 2015 | 569 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 45 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + XV Line package | 2015 - December 2015 | 663 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 46 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Lime Multimedia package X4P | 2015 — 2016 | 677 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 47 | 1.6 AMT Luxe Lime X00 | 2015 — 2016 | 653 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 48 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Optima package | 2015 — 2016 | 624 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 49 | 1.6 AMT Luxe | 2015 — 2016 | 648 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 50 | 1.6 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2015 — 2016 | 672 000 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 51 | 1.6 AMT Comfort | 2015 - December 2017 | 647 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 52 | 1.6 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2015 - December 2017 | 670 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.8 | 178 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,6 |
| 53 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort | 2020 — | 891 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 54 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 927 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 55 | 1.6 CNG MT Classic + Start package | 2017 — | 860 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 7,5 |
| 56 | 1.6 CNG MT Luxe | 2017 — | 953 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 57 | 1.6 CNG MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2017 — | 994 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 58 | 1.6 CNG MT Comfort | 2017 — 2020 | 879 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1596 | 12.9 | 170 | 106 (78) / 5800 | 6,3 |
| 59 | 1.6 CVT Comfort | 2020 — | 816 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 60 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Multimedia package | 2020 — | 860 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 61 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 852 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 62 | 1.6 CVT Classic + Start Plus package | November 2022 — | 785 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 63 | 1.6 CVT Exclusive | November 2022 — | 973 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 64 | 1.6 CVT Luxe | November 2022 — | 878 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 65 | 1.6 CVT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2022 — | 919 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 66 | 1.6 CVT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2022 — | 941 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 67 | 1.6 CVT Comfort | November 2022 - 2020 | 782 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | None |
| 68 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Image package | November 2022 - 2020 | 805 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 69 | 1.6 CVT Comfort + Multimedia package | November 2022 – December 2020 | 813 900 | Front | Variable speed drive | 1598 | 11.3 | 175 | 113 (83) / 5500 | 7,1 |
| 70 | 1.8MT Comfort | 2020 — | 756 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 71 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Winter package | 2020 — | 792 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 72 | 1.8MT Exclusive | November 2022 — | 913 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 73 | 1.8MT Luxe | November 2022 — | 818 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 74 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | November 2022 — | 859 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 75 | 1.8MT Comfort | November 2022 - 2020 | 732 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 76 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | November 2022 - 2020 | 755 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 77 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Prestige package | November 2022 - 2020 | 872 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 78 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 843 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 79 | 1.8MT Comfort | 2018 - November 2019 | 714 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 80 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 737 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 81 | 1.8MT Exclusive | 2018 - November 2019 | 799 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 82 | 1.8MT Luxe | 2018 - November 2019 | 735 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 83 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2018 - November 2019 | 763 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 84 | 1.8MT Comfort | October 2022 – December 2017 | 657 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 85 | 1.8 MT Comfort + Image package | October 2022 – December 2017 | 680 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 86 | 1.8MT Luxe | October 2022 – December 2017 | 720 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 87 | 1.8 MT Luxe + Multimedia package | October 2022 – December 2017 | 748 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 88 | 1.8MT Exclusive | 2017 - December 2017 | 799 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 10.2 | 188 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,8 |
| 89 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Prestige package | 2018 - November 2019 | 848 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 90 | 1.8 AMT Comfort | 2018 - November 2018 | 707 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 91 | 1.8 AMT Comfort + Image package | 2018 - November 2019 | 762 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 92 | 1.8 AMT Exclusive | 2018 - November 2019 | 881 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 93 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | 2018 - November 2019 | 830 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 94 | 1.8 AMT Exclusive | 2017 - December 2017 | 824 400 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 95 | 1.8 AMT Comfort | October 2016 – December 2017 | 682 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 96 | 1.8 AMT Comfort + Image package | October 2016 – December 2017 | 705 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
| 97 | 1.8 AMT Luxe + Multimedia package | October 2016 – December 2017 | 773 900 | Front | Manual transmission 5 | 1774 | 12.1 | 186 | 122 (90) / 5900 | 7,2 |
* — information on prices is for reference only. Check with your local dealer for exact pricing.
Who has richer equipment
Both cars already offer the necessary minimum as standard: a pair of airbags, Isofix child seat anchors, electric windows, folding rear sofa backrests and headrests for three passengers sitting in the back. In total, VW Polo has 5 trim levels and 10 body colors; Lada Vesta has 4 trim levels and 9 body colors, including lime, which is not available on more recent models.
The Polo interior pleases with many pleasant little things: hooks, pockets, a glove compartment with an eyeglass case, and high-quality finishing materials. Vesta captivates with its technology! Already in the basic version you get ABS, EBD, BAS, ESC, TCS and HSA. Polo only has ABS and optional ESP/ESC in top versions. In older trim levels, both models include climate and cruise control.
According to subjective assessments, the Polo has a softer suspension, a little more dynamic and more accurate response to the steering wheel and gas pedal. For a person who spends a lot of time driving, these moments are much more important than electronic assistants. Due to higher backrests and more space between the first and second rows of seats, Polo is more comfortable to sit in than Vesta.
They did a good job on the soundproofing of the Volks. In terms of acoustic comfort, it also outperforms Vesta: no extraneous sounds, the engine runs quietly. In the Vesta's cabin, on the contrary, everything is noisy and creaks.
Also read: Which Polo is better to choose: comparing generations
Maintenance costs
Although these cars are presented in the same price segment, the prices for their maintenance vary significantly. Domestic cars provide significantly less financial maintenance costs. Moreover, there are never any difficulties finding spare parts and consumables, for the simple reason that everything you need is available in almost every auto parts store. With the Volkswagen Polo, things are more complicated, since this car only recently entered the Russian market. Moreover, prices for spare parts and consumables are slightly higher, although the difference in the first years of operation will not be so significant. As for everyday fuel costs, Lada Vesta once again looks like the favorite here, since this car consumes AI-92 fuel, which is an order of magnitude cheaper than gasoline with a higher octane number AI-95.
Interior
The development approach differs radically.
- Lada Vesta takes a turn towards aggression and sporty surroundings. The center console and dashboard look attractive. Black plastic wraps around the front of the cabin and blends harmoniously with everything else.
- The readings from the sensors are easy to read, the control keys are located rationally and conveniently. There is a multi-level seat configuration, and there is more freedom and spaciousness in the back.
- Every element inside the Volkswagen Polo knows its place and is located where it is needed. A comfortable steering wheel, a slightly inclined center console, black plastic framing the entire interior, an easy-to-read instrument panel - all this contributes to incomparable comfort and reliability.
- The seats are tight and can be adjusted; there will be plenty of space for two passengers in the back. For safety, two airbags are provided.
Appearance and dimensions
These cars differ noticeably not only in terms of cost and technical equipment, but also in the case of appearance. Both models at first glance seem practical and reliable, however, taking a closer look, it becomes obvious that the Russian car is again inferior to its German competitor. The design of the Lada Vesta is somewhat outdated and requires modernization. The Volkswagen Polo liftback is a stylish and ultra-modern car that impresses with its practicality, but at the same time does not forget to stand out with numerous decorative elements. Particularly pleasant emotions are evoked by the rear and head optics, which have undergone major changes compared to its predecessor.
The Russian model is a fairly compact representative of its class, if you look at the numbers. However, if you put Volkswagen Polo and Lada Vesta next to each other, the difference will be almost invisible visually. Models have the following dimensions:
- Polo length is 4,469 mm, Vest’s is 4,410 mm;
- Volkswagen width is 1,706 mm, Lada is 1,764 mm;
- the height of the German liftback is 1,471 mm, that of the Russian sedan is 1,469 mm;
- wheelbase of the Lada is 2635 mm, that of the Volkswagen is 2591 mm;
- the curb weight of the Russian model is 1,230 kg, that of the German is 1,185 kg.
The sixth-generation German vehicle is longer than its competitor, however, the Lada Vesta is wider, which is why the cars have interiors that are almost identical in terms of the amount of free space.
Capacity
For many, capacity is a deciding factor. And here the German obviously wins. Here everything is decided by the body format. Vesta is a sedan, Polo is a liftback, which means that the latter allows you to use more free space. AvtoVAZ offers 480 liters, and Volkswagen makes available 530 liters.
Yes, there is a Vesta SW in a station wagon, but only a sedan can be compared with the Polo. By the way, the presence of a choice of bodies can also be attributed to the advantages of the model from AvtoVAZ.
Salon and trunk
Since it is necessary to make a full comparison of the Volkswagen Polo and Lada Vesta, we also have to consider the interior of the vehicle and the capacity of the luggage compartments. Regarding the first point, the German liftback is the undisputed favorite. In this model, the quality of the finish is especially impressive, and in addition, the high cost of the materials used. Also in the Volkswagen Polo there is a stylish design with numerous high-tech solutions. When looking at this car, it becomes obvious that the designers decided to significantly modernize the vehicle so that it fully complies with modern fashion trends.
The new Volkswagen Polo liftback has an attractive interior with a moderate color, where there are mainly dark shades. At first glance, the car captivates with its practicality, since the main elements are located strictly in their places to make the driver as comfortable as possible during the trip. Of course, the availability of free space is not the strong point of budget models. However, as for the German liftback, the car is almost equal to representatives of higher classes in this indicator. Among the key features, it is worth highlighting the huge display of the multimedia system, the stylish steering wheel and gear selector, as well as the digital instrument panel, which is provided in more expensive trim levels.
The Russian car in this case is outdated compared to its direct competitor. Moreover, the future owner will not be pleased with the quality of the interior trim, which is much inferior to other rivals in this segment. The interior design looks painfully familiar, and even at first glance it becomes clear that the designers were inspired by the interior of earlier Lada cars. The biggest drawbacks of the car are the large selector, the minimalistic climate control unit, and the center console, which is very forward in relation to the entire panel. As for the advantages, the most notable ones are the pleasant steering wheel, as well as the instrumentation, which has received ultra-modern instrument scales.
The luggage compartments of these cars do not differ so significantly, even though the German model is a liftback, where there is noticeably more space than in a standard sedan. The luggage compartment of the Lada Vesta holds an impressive 480 liters, which is enough for many motorists to transport all the necessary things. As for the German car, the trunk volume here is 530 liters, and at the same time, it can be increased almost three times. However, this will require folding down the rear row of passenger seats.
Body, interior, electrical
Polo has been in production for almost 10 years, Vesta's lifespan is half that, so it is still difficult to fully judge age-related problems. Nevertheless, in terms of paintwork strength and body corrosion resistance, both cars are comparable, plus or minus. Frankly, they don’t rot, but on well-travelled cars you can already find local pockets of corrosion. However, this hardly applies to cars that are three or four years old - just before purchasing, you should check the body for the absence of such problems, and after purchasing, spare no time and money for a high-quality anticorrosive agent.
There are probably more “crickets” in the interior of a used Vesta than in a Polo, but this mostly applies to cars from the early batches, then the situation improved. Rubbing side windows are also the scourge of the first copies. In any case, nothing critical. Failures of functional equipment are possible, but early versions of Polo could not do without it. It depends on your luck: some owners drive without problems for years, while others encounter problems with the air conditioning (Polo) or multimedia system (Vesta). So we just check the equipment before purchasing.
In general, in terms of the durability of the body, the endurance of the interior, the reliability of functional equipment and electrics, there is plus or minus parity. Some problems were noted in both models, but neither Polo nor Vesta have any serious shortcomings in this regard. Of course, you should understand that we are talking about budget cars, where you have to turn a blind eye to easily scratched hard plastic or the same notorious “crickets” in the cabin. But if we take corrosion resistance, we cannot say that Vesta looks worse than Polo here, and Polo is inferior, for example, to much more expensive Volkswagen models.
What is better to choose
Which car is better to choose is up to each car enthusiast to decide for himself. It is not so easy to single out a clear favorite among the presented models, even despite the clear superiority of the German liftback. This is due to the fact that domestic cars are much cheaper to purchase and subsequently maintain. As for other points, the Volkswagen Polo looks preferable. However, this does not mean that a Russian car can be immediately crossed out if you have the money to buy a Polo. Lada Vesta is also worthy of attention if you really need a reliable and unpretentious car.
Vesta vs Polo: pros and cons
It remains to compare Polo against Vesta, taking into account the final pros and cons.
Positive aspects of the Volkswagen Polo:
- Good acceleration dynamics...
- Low fuel consumption.
- Convenient on-board computer.
- Neat salon.
Negative sides:
- Cheap materials in interior decoration.
- Noisy engine.
- Poor sound insulation.
For a budget car, such assessments from drivers are not surprising.
Pros of Lada Vesta:
- Low cost of the car.
- Cheap service.
- Suspension suitable for Russian roads.
- Saturation in the minimum version.
Negative aspects of Lada Vesta:
- Poor build quality.
- Short service life.
- Ambiguous interior design.
- High fuel consumption.
The pros and cons are collected based on reviews from real owners who have used the cars for a long time.
Other options
When considering any of these cars for an upcoming purchase, do not forget that these are not the only representatives of their class that are now present on the car market in Russia. Also, a potential buyer can make a choice in favor of other state employees. In particular, here we are talking about cars from South Korea, namely the Hyundai Solaris and Kia Rio, a Czech-made car Skoda Rapid, as well as the Chinese representative of this segment Changan Alsvin. Each named machine deserves attention, as it can stand out from its competitors due to its key features.
Car suspension and handling
Here AvtoVAZ and Volkswagen AG did not take risks and none of the models has a multi-link chassis. This decision was made to reduce the overall cost of cars. The car is equipped with parts familiar to this class - MacPherson struts at the front, semi-independent suspension at the rear.
Volkswagen Polo is considered to be an example of handling among sedans of this class. Lada Vesta was able to reach the level of the standard, but, without a doubt, it was not without a doubt; nevertheless, in some small details it loses to the German. The advantage of the Lada is its high ground clearance, while the disadvantage of the Volkswagen is the low location of the rear spring supports. The supports are strong, but when you hit an obstacle, a noticeable grinding noise causes discomfort.
